<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Mofid University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>The Journal of Economic Studies and Policies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2423-4648</Issn>
				<Volume></Volume>
				<Issue>Articles in Press</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>06</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Criteria for an Optimal Model of Government–Charity Relations in Livelihood Provision: An Islamic Perspective</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Criteria for an Optimal Model of Government–Charity Relations in Livelihood Provision: An Islamic Perspective</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">736694</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22096/esp.2026.2079310.1851</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Mostafa</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kazemi Najaf Abadi</LastName>
<Affiliation>Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Institute for Social Sciences, Research Institute of Hawzeh and University, Qom, Iran.</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-2271-2714</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>11</Month>
					<Day>29</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>&lt;span&gt;Using a descriptive-analytical method and drawing on Shi‘a jurisprudential sources and the Prophetic tradition (Sīra), this study extracts five key criteria for assessing the optimal model of government relations with the livelihood charity sector from an Islamic perspective. The first criterion, distributive justice, is interpreted through the distribution of zakāt—not strictly equal but needs-based and oriented toward public interest—which obligates the government to conduct comprehensive needs assessments via information systems. The second is social welfare and effectiveness, aimed at securing livelihood sufficiency (ma‘ūna) or lifting the needy to the societal average, while emphasizing that government intervention should be limited to the sufficiency level. Transparency and accountability constitute the third criterion, mandating governmental oversight to prevent misuse and enhance public trust. The fourth, public participation and charity autonomy, is grounded in the Islamic principle of takāful (social solidarity), which assigns primary agency to the individual, family, and community, thereby restricting the state to a complementary and facilitative role. The final criterion, ethics-centricity and voluntarism, prioritizes preserving the divine intention and the innate human disposition (fiṭra) to give (infāq) and avoiding artificial incentives such as tax pressures. Together, these criteria provide a foundation for designing the optimal government–charity relationship and serve as a benchmark for comparing proposed models through Islamic indicators.&lt;/span&gt;</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">&lt;span&gt;Using a descriptive-analytical method and drawing on Shi‘a jurisprudential sources and the Prophetic tradition (Sīra), this study extracts five key criteria for assessing the optimal model of government relations with the livelihood charity sector from an Islamic perspective. The first criterion, distributive justice, is interpreted through the distribution of zakāt—not strictly equal but needs-based and oriented toward public interest—which obligates the government to conduct comprehensive needs assessments via information systems. The second is social welfare and effectiveness, aimed at securing livelihood sufficiency (ma‘ūna) or lifting the needy to the societal average, while emphasizing that government intervention should be limited to the sufficiency level. Transparency and accountability constitute the third criterion, mandating governmental oversight to prevent misuse and enhance public trust. The fourth, public participation and charity autonomy, is grounded in the Islamic principle of takāful (social solidarity), which assigns primary agency to the individual, family, and community, thereby restricting the state to a complementary and facilitative role. The final criterion, ethics-centricity and voluntarism, prioritizes preserving the divine intention and the innate human disposition (fiṭra) to give (infāq) and avoiding artificial incentives such as tax pressures. Together, these criteria provide a foundation for designing the optimal government–charity relationship and serve as a benchmark for comparing proposed models through Islamic indicators.&lt;/span&gt;</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Livelihood Charity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Government</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Optimal Relations</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Islamic Criteria</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Distributive Justice</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">good governance</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
